Major Win for Rieter in Patent Dispute in China

In a judgment in December 2023, the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s  Republic of China ruled in favor of Rieter in a legal dispute. The case  concerned the infringement of a Rieter patent by a competitor’s draw frame.  Rieter protects its innovations with patents and registered designs and  consistently takes action against infringements of its intellectual property. 

Rieter draw frames are known for their stable operation with high sliver quality and  productivity. Superb scanning precision and highest autoleveling dynamics ensure  outstanding sliver evenness and thus the production of high-quality yarns. Draw  frames have also been the subject of a patent litigation by Rieter in China at various  levels of jurisdiction. Rieter had sued a competitor for unauthorized use of its  patented draw frame technology.

 In the summer of 2022, the Shanghai Intellectual Property Court confirmed the  patent infringement identified by Rieter and prohibited the accused competitor from  continuing to use Rieter’s patented technology. The infringing party was also ordered  to pay damages to Rieter. 

 The culpable competitor then appealed the decision of the Shanghai court to the  Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China.

In December 2023, the Supreme Court of China in Beijing upheld the Shanghai  decision, confirming that the patent had been infringed. As a result, Rieter’s  competitor is prohibited from selling the infringing machine types and is required  to pay the damages determined by the court.  

This Supreme Court decision represents a major success for Rieter in defending its  proprietary technologies in China. It is further proof that foreign companies can  effectively defend their intellectual property in China. 

As the technology leader in spinning machinery manufacturing, Rieter invests  around 5% of its turnover annually in research and development. Rieter protects its  innovative products with patents and registered designs and takes consistent action  against infringements of industrial property rights. 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *